“The essential fact of quantum mechanics is entanglement” (Leonard Susskind). It was this “lucid mysticism” (Pauli) of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) with its holistic quantum entanglement—Einstein’s “spooky action at a distance”—that begat the catastrophic violation of the essentialist scientific realist *principle of locality*— the foundation of causal Local Scientific Realism/Materialism—the very ontic fundament of Western Science: no signal or information between “space-like separated” particles can exceed Einstein’s light speed limit; yet superluminal speed seems required for one nonlocal entangled particle in a two part quantum system to instantly “know” the spin state of the other particle, even when separated by many light years. Enter, the “spooky” antirealist* quantum principle of nonlocality.*

At this inherently vexed nonlocal substrate—the zero point energy field vacuum ground state (ZPE)—subject and object merge. There are no “substantival” points/objects, but rather a continuous Heraclitean flux of structural* relations*. Cosmos is process, not things. Things are but Hume’s inferred “bundles of properties”—mass, charge and spin. ZPE pervades boundless whole of the quantum continuum, hence wave/particle *processes *are embedded in and subsumed by this vast whole. Only the whole has properties. Particles are conceptual fabrications, not objective realities. Here classical Newtonian atomistic ontology utterly breaks down.

* Interdependent *relationship is all there is. Indeed, for *habitués* of this fuzzy quantum realm, we have in David Hume’s words, an “affrighted and confounded” collapse of objective reality; of an *observer-independent* “real world out there” (RWOT).

The “unfolding explicate order” of wave-particle parts is for David Bohm (1980) always “enfolded” in his “implicate order” of the great holographic “holomovement” continuum, the “vast unbroken whole” itself. For Bohm it is misleading to speak of *observer-independent* separate “parts”. He prefers the untidy epithet “relatively independent subtotalities”. Here, QFT fields are not real objective *things*, but subjective *observer-dependent *relations.

Bohm’s “vast implicate order of the whole” helps us to understand the intrinsic connectedness and interdependence of our above two quantum entangled particles, without exceeding Einstein’s light speed limit. How? Explicate separate relativistic particles are *ultimately* embedded in the implicate whole itself. As are all of us. We are not separate from That (*tat, sat*). Classical objective Local Scientific Realism/Materialism is thus a failed ontology. But wait! Might such Realism obsequies be premature?

Bohm and his mentor Einstein were “hidden variables” realists. Both believed quantum theory incomplete; but Bohm retained quantum nonlocality. We need an as yet undiscovered “hidden parameter” to explain this “spooky” nonlocal nature of reality.

Hidden variables theory now stands refuted. Physical spacetime locality (local contact of physical stuff) has been tested many times and found wanting. The definitive work consists of John Bell’s “inequalities” (1965); then Alain Aspect’s proof of Bell’s Theorem (1982). All have demonstrated the truth of nonlocality. Ronald Hanson (2015 arXiv.org) and Anton Zeilinger (2017) have finally closed all the “locality loopholes”.

Einstein’s 1905 Special Relativity Theory (SRT) opposed Newton’s substance view of spacetime, the* physical* foundational ground of appearing reality. Einstein inveighed for a relational/relativistic non-temporal spacetime. Yet his inner realist 1915 General Relativity Theory (GRT) curved spacetime geometry (T*іј*) seems to commit him to a local substance view. He rejected quantum nonlocality to the very end.

The bad news for any local realist ontology? *Quantum entanglement/nonlocality means the end of our beloved* *metaphysic of local, objective Scientific Realism.* Must 2400 years of Platonic Realism—a purely physical, observer/model-independent separate RWOT—now be relegated to the ontological trash bin of history? It seems so. Classical absolute objectivity, causality and local spacetime are *kaput*!

This quantum quandary—fantasque nonlocal ZPE quantum emptiness—has shaken the very foundations of classical deductive logic, to wit, Aristotle’s Law of Excluded Middle: “either A or not-A”; for any proposition,* either *that proposition is true, *or* its negation is true. Upon this logical bedrock we base our objectivist atomistic treatment of elementary particle discreteness, countability and physical identity. Scientific Local Realism, with “common sense realism” (Russell’s “metaphysics of the stone age”) are no longer tenable. *Either* spacetime reality exists; *or *it does not. If quantum non-locality obtains, then spacetime reality does not. Could be bad for the economy. Is there a centrist Buddhist middle way between these ontic extremes of objective local existence, and spooky nonlocal quantum emptiness? (Boaz 2020A)

Perhaps then, we should dump this learned bivalent Western logical canon for a contradiction-tolerant trivalent (3VL) deductive logic that accesses the subtle precision and depth of the contemplative Buddhist *Dzogchen*“logic of the non-conceptual”. Indeed, there’s a lot of reality between the bogus duality of true and false. Such multi-valued paraconsistent logics, including Indian *Nyaya* with its five axioms, surpass Aristotle’s “Three Laws of Thought”. Further, the Logical Intuitionism of L.E.J Brouwer denies altogether the validity of excluded middle. In any case, there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in our course objectivist philosophies.

Excerpted from David Paul Boaz, *The Collapse of Objective Reality: Quantum Nonlocality and Buddhist Emptiness, 2020,* Ch. 13.

davidpaulboaz.org; coppermount.org